| Keywords: | Mexico; Private industry; Cell-/Tissue culture; Genemapping techniques; Genetic engineering; Seed; Herbicide/pesticide tolerance; Fruits and nuts; Vegetables; Monsanto Company; Relation public-private sector. |
| Correct citation: | Massieu, Y. (1998), "ELM: A new global player in the vegetable market." Biotechnology and Development Monitor, No. 34, p. 9-13. |
The Mexican company Empresas La Moderna (ELM) has entered the world seed and fresh produce market at unprecedented speed. Starting from scratch, the company has become one of the world’ s five largest seed companies, and the world’ s leading vegetable seed company in just 3 years. Through a series of well coordinated acquisitions and strategic alliances, ELM became an integrated fresh produce and seed company with access to major markets, genetic materials, breeding programmes and advanced biotechnology.
ELM’ s strategy for becoming a global vegetable seed producer has to be seen against the background of trends in the world seed market. In recent years stagnation in demand, increasing international competition, higher R&D costs and shorter product life cycles for new varieties have put pressure on seed prices and reduced profit margins. To maintain or even increase profits seed companies had to shift away from a traditional product and technical orientation towards a market oriented strategy.
Reassessment of target variables
In the light of the changes in the global seed market, competitive
seed companies have to reassess the following target variables:
The market-segment scope. Seed companies have to decide for
the crops, the market needs and seed qualities they are aiming at. Each
market has its specific quality segments and seed companies have to make
sure their products meet the respective demands. For instance, tomato varieties
have to be chosen according to the specific market segments a company is
aiming at, such as fresh produce, tomato soup or paste. For these specific
segments, a company has to get hold of the required crop varieties and
germplasm. To provide these varieties, traditional plant breeding is applied,
but increasingly, modern biotechnology is becoming an additional tool used
for the improvement of seeds.
A seed company that is engaged in the production of different seeds
therefore needs to have access at the same time to traditional breeding,
a broad germplasm base and modern biotechnologies.
The geographical scope. Seed companies have to take into consideration
the location and size of their markets because seed varieties are restricted
by specific climatic ranges. Expansion to new regions by introducing new
varieties is costly and risky, not only because new varieties have to compete
with existing ones but also because new distribution systems have to be
developed.
The degree of vertical integration. Seed companies may be devoted
to a single specialist area or may integrate several areas of activities
such as basic research, biotechnology, breeding, propagation, distribution
and marketing. This approach towards vertical integration along the production
chain could provide competitive advantages because it allows companies
quality control for the whole production process while tailoring the product
to specific market demands.
In the 1990s, the marketing of the first genetically engineered crops
has played an important role in the strategy of the seed industry. These
genetically modified crops are expected to develop a new segment in the
market, that will complement the classically bred ones. The main characteristics
of these new varieties include resistance to herbicides and pests as well
as added value for further processing. Additionally, intellectual property
rights (IPRs) will become an increasingly important restructuring factor
in the seed industry. For example, according to Suri Sehgal of Plant
Genetic Systems (Belgium), the development of a new (transgenic) variety
will depend on a large number of private technologies. Securing access
to these new technologies, while using their own technologies as trading
chips, could become decisive for the future viability of a seed company
(see also Monitor No. 29).
Changing activities
ELM’ s strategy in the world seed market incorporates these new dynamics
in the world seed industry. By a series of strategic acquisitions of and
alliances with seed companies, biotechnology firms and fresh produce enterprises
(see box 1), ELM has firmly established itself as a
vertically integrated, global giant in vegetable seeds, vegetable production
and distribution.
ELM is part of Pulsar International, a Mexican corporation involved
in insurance, financial services and construction, with an annual sales
volume of US$ 2.0 billion. In 1985 Pulsar bought Cigarrera La Moderna
(CLM), Mexico’ s largest cigarette manufacturer, which became ELM’ s most
profitable subsidiary. Between 1994 and 1995, however, ELM changed its
main activity from cigarette manufacturing towards vegetable seeds and
fresh produce. CLM’ s cigarette sales decreased from US$ 726 million in
1994 to US$ 674 million in 1995, while seeds sales grew in the same year
from zero to US$ 374 million (see box 2). The decision
to disengage from the cigarette business was also effected by ELM’ s difficulties
to compete with Cigatam, the second largest Mexican producer, which
was taken over by the world’ s leading cigarette manufacturer Philip
Morris (USA).
ELM’ s increasing seed sales were mainly based on the turnover of acquired
subsidiaries. This brought ELM into a leading position in the world vegetable
seed market with a share of 22 per cent in 1996. Furthermore, between 1994
and 1996, ELM was able to increase fresh produce sales from US$ 23 million
to more than US$ 200 million. This transition was completed in 1997 when
ELM resold its CLM shares to British American Tobacco Industries
for approximately US$ 1.7 billion.
| ELM’ s agrobiotechnology division
ELM’ s acquisitions and strategic alliances 1994 ELM acquires the seed company Asgrow-Bruinsma (USA); 1995 ELM acquires the seed company Petoseed-Royal Sluis (USA); Establishment of Seminis merger of Asgrow-Bruinsma and Petoseed-Royal Sluis; 1996 ELM acquires 70 per cent of the biotechnology and fresh produce company DNA Plant Technology; merger of DNAP and ELM’ s Bionova into DNAP Holding Corp; 1996 ELM acquires 51 per cent of the fresh produce distributor Royal Van Namen 1996 ELM sells Asgrow Agronomics to Monsanto and signs a technological collaboration agreement with Monsanto; 1997 ELM sells its cigarette manufacturer Cigarrera La Moderna (CLM) to British American Tobacco Industries. Source: Mexican newspapers and magazines
|
Asgrow’ s major vegetable seed products are peas, beans, sweet maize,
cucumber, tomatoes, carrots, lettuces, onions and cantaloupes. The company
is active in both conventional breeding and genetic engineering. It holds
several patents on transgenic and non-transgenic vegetables. In 1995, for
example, it obtained clearance under US regulations to release a transgenic
squash variety resistant to watermelon mosaic virus 2 (WMM2) and
zuchini yellow mosaic virus. In 1997, Asgrow announced that it will
add resistance to papaya ringspot virus. Other patents include long shelf
life for broccoli and tomatoes, as well as hybrid broccoli for both fresh
and processing markets.
Asgrow has a collaboration agreement with the Dutch biotechnology company
Mogen, now a subsidiary of Zeneca (UK), on nematode resistant
varieties of specific horticultural crops. Furthermore, Asgrow has established
service facility stations in the USA and is engaged in seed coating. Asgrow’
s subsidiary Bruinsma is now Seminis’ specialist in vegetables produced
in green houses, such as cucumber and tomato.
Petoseed was acquired by ELM in 1995. This productive company has already
marketed 25 new varieties since 1994, mainly cucumber, melon and tomato
varieties. The company is active in both conventional breeding and genetic
engineering. In 1995, for example, it introduced a genetically modified
tomato for food processing, which was developed together with Zeneca
Plant Science (UK). In this cooperation, Zeneca Plant Science provided
the gene technology. For 1998, Petoseed announced the commercialization
of hybrid cauliflower varieties, developed by using a cytoplasmic male
sterility (CMS) method. CMS is an effective method to produce hybrids
by employing plants with sterile pollen. Like Asgrow, Petoseed is also
engaged in seed coating. Finally, Seminis owns 100 per cent of the Netherlands’
seed company Royal Sluis. This corporation is specialized in cabbage, cauliflower,
lettuce and spinach.
| ELM' s agrobiotechnology division | |||||
| Subsidiaries | Sales 1995*
(million US$) |
Brand | Main technologies | Main products | Primary markets |
| ELM DNAP Holding | |||||
| DNA Plant Technology (DNAP) | 20** | Fresh World Farms | *Plant
Regeneration *Transwitch Patent *Genetic Engineering |
cherry tomato, tomato, snap pea, pepper, banana, pineapple, strawberry | North America, Europe, Asia, Middle and Far East |
| Bionova Subsidiaries | 178 | Premier Selection, Master’ s Touch | fresh produce and distribution of vegetables and fruits | North America, Europe, Middle and Far East | |
| subtotal fresh produce and biotechnology | 198 | ||||
| ELM Seminis | |||||
| Asgrow-Bruinsma | 122 | Asgrow | *Germplasm
Development *Genetic
*Molecular
*Cell Biology |
tomato, carrot, onion, pepper, bean, pea, corn, melon, cucumber, brassica | worldwide |
| 11 | Bruinsma | greenhouse tomato, pepper, cucumber | Europe | ||
| Petoseed | 141 | Petoseed | tomato, pepper, eggplant, brassica, onion, melon, cucumber | worldwide | |
| 95 | Royal Sluis | brassica, bean, tomato, lettuce | Europe, Asia | ||
| Others | 5 | Genecorp | lettuce | North America | |
| subtotal seeds | 374 | ||||
| Total sales ELM agro-
biotechnology division |
572 | ||||
| * including sales of acquired new subsidiaries
** including fresh produce sales, product development and incomes from investment and R&D contracts |
|||||
Vertical integration
Although DNAP should provide ELM with cutting edge biotechnology, the
company has not been integrated into Seminis, ELM’ s seed division. Instead,
it was merged with ELM’ s fresh produce subsidiary Bionova. The
main reason for this is DNAP’ s distribution of fresh vegetables in the
USA under the brand name Fresh World Farms. DNAP fresh produce distribution
is mainly concentrated in the northeastern states and thus complements
the distribution network of the Bionova subsidiaries which are mainly active
in western and southern parts of the USA. To further extend ELM’ s fresh
produce activities outside the USA, Canada, Mexico and South America, 51
per cent of the Dutch fresh produce distributor Royal Van Namen
was acquired in 1996. This acquisition provided ELM with access to the
fresh produce markets in Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
By this strategic mix of acquisitions, ELM has created a vertically
integrated vegetable company controlling both its most strategic input,
the seed, and its distribution channels on a global scale. Its vertical
integration strategy includes production of vegetable by contract farming,
using ELM’ s seeds on leased or farmer-owned lands. However, one link is
still missing, namely the combination of DNAP’ s biotechnological expertise
and Seminis’ vegetable germplasm bank.
Technological collaboration with Monsanto
On its search for strategic alliances, ELM embarked on several cooperations
with the US biotechnology company Monsanto in 1997. In the past,
these two companies had a legal quarrel about DNAP’ s Transwitch patent.
A settlement was reached in 1995 which forbade DNAP to commercialize its
transgenic Endless Summer Tomato. The agreement between ELM and
Monsanto reflects a division of market shares. Monsanto’ s interests in
vegetables is limited to tomatoes. This is confirmed by Monsanto’ s acquisition
of Calgene (USA), the first company to commercialize a transgenic,
long shelf-life tomato. Although the competition between Monsanto and ELM
in the tomato market continues, ELM withdrew from the transgenic, long
shelf-life tomato market. The details of this settlement remain undisclosed.
However, it seemed to have had an intensifying effect on the relationship
between the two companies: For instance, in 1996, ELM sold Asgrow Seeds’
agronomic division, mainly active in hybrid maize, hybrid sorghum and soya
beans, for US$ 240 million to Monsanto. In 1997, the two companies signed
a technological collaboration agreement which gives ELM access to Monsanto’
s herbicide resistance technology. It allows the introduction of resistance
against Monsanto’ s glyphosate based herbicide Roundup in ELM’ s
vegetable varieties. Other technologies interesting for ELM are Monsanto’
s technology to use coat-protein mediated virus-protection and Bacillus
thuringiensis (Bt) for the control of lepidopteran insects such as
carterpillars. ELM’ s access to Monsanto technologies will strengthen ELM’
s position in vegetables other than tomatoes, thereby not competing with
Monsanto.
In November 1997, Monsanto and ELM announced the joint acquisition
of a 20 per cent stake in Mendel Biotechnology (USA) for US$ 30
million. Mendel Biotechnology is a private gene-research company that will
enable the two agrobiology-companies to identify genes for the development
of specific traits, such as disease resistance in crops.
Global from the start
ELM’ s decision to enter the vegetable seed market on a global level
was not only due to the developments in the international seed market.
It was also promoted by unfavourable circumstances in Mexico. Firstly,
the supply of germplasm and technology from Mexican biotechnology research
institutes is very limited. Mexican plant biotechnology research is dominated
by public institutions with restricted budgets and a scarce output of commercial
varieties. During the last five years, only four Mexican institutions,
i.e. Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV),
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Instituto
Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias (INIFAP) and
the Universidad de Puebla, have been working on the development
of new plant varieties, employing genetic engineering as well as conventional
breeding methods. Yet none of these varieties has reached any commercial
application.
Secondly, the domestic seed market was already saturated by
suppliers from the USA, amongst which were Asgrow and Petoseed. Mexico
is the major market for US seed exports, which are likely to increase under
the new conditions set by the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA).
Yolanda Massieu
Metropolitan Autonomous University-Azcapotzalco, Department of Sociology, Av. San Pablo 180, C.P. 02200, Mexico City, Mexico. Phone (+52) 5 724 4344; Fax (+52) 5 394-8093; E-mail ymt@hp9000a1.uam.mx
This article is the result of the scholarship programme of the Biotechnology and Development Monitor.
Sources
Annual and Quarterly Reports of DNAP, Bionova, Monsanto and Upjohn
1994 to 1996.
A.M.A. Heijbroek and E.M.L. de Schutter (1996), The World Seed Market: Developments and strategies. Rabobank study, Food & Agribusiness Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Several issues of Seed&Crops Industry, 1994 to 1996.
Several issues of Biotech Reporter, Biotech Business News, 1994-1996
Personal communications with H. Pennings (Seminis Biotechnology Europe), M. Stowers (Seminis Marketing) and S. Sehgal (PGS).
|
![]() |
| back to top |
|
|
|
|