
| Keywords: | Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR); Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD); Patent law; India; Access to genetic resources; Germplasm conservation; Indigenous Knowledge. |
| Correct citation: | Balakrishna, P. (1998), "The Need for a "TRIPS PLUS" Regime." Biotechnology and Development Monitor, No. 36, p. 8. |
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has three major goals: conservation of biodiversity; sustainable use of biodiversity; and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of such use. While there is considerable progress with reference to the first two goals, initiatives relating to equitable sharing of benefits have been inadequate.
Subsequent to the implementation of the CBD, the World Trade Organization’s
(WTO) Agreement on Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)
has also come into force. Under the agreement, "Members shall provide
for the protection of plant varieties either by patents or by an effective
sui generis system or by any combination thereof". With the strengthening
and widening of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) regime, industrialized
countries have been attempting to patent materials based on traditional
knowledge and genetic strains particularly obtained from developing countries.
For example, traditional medicinal crops such as neem and turmeric have
been subjected in recent years to IPR claims in the industrialized countries.
Even plant materials of well established geographical identity such as
basmati rice grown in Pakistan and India, has been subjected to IPR claims.
Other IPR claims have led the Consultative Group on International
Agricultural Research (CGIAR) to call for a moratorium on IPR claims
on seeds held in trust in their gene banks such as the International
Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) in India
and the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines.
Moreover, Non-Governmental Organization’s (NGOs) such as India’s
Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology and the
Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI) of North America
are against patenting of genetic resources as this will be detrimental
for resource poor farmers in developing countries. RAFI has played a crucial
role in exposing the unjustified IPR claims on CGIAR germplasm.
There is an urgent need to harmonize the provisions of TRIPS with the
equitable benefit sharing and Prior Informed Consent (PIC) provisions
of the CBD. There is a need for a new global trade and transactions order,
a "TRIPS Plus". The "Plus" refers to equity and ethics in IPR claims.
Since the same governments are members of both the WTO and the CBD, there
is a need for coordinated action in matters relating to biodiversity. In
this context, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
has been considering the recognition of traditional knowledge systems and
informal innovations. In November 1997, the WIPO established a Global
Intellectual Property Issues Division (GIPID) to examine newly emerging
IPR issues. This includes the traditional knowledge which was originally
not with WIPO’s mandate.
One of the ways in which new insights can possibly be achieved could
be through the development of local, national and international codes of
conduct to address the issue of integrating equity provisions into the
"TRIPS Plus" Regime. This could be of immediate necessity for several countries
who are members of both the CBD and WTO.
There are several significant voluntary initiatives such as the Tropical
Botanic Garden Research Institute (TBGRI) of India. In this model,
the TBGRI has developed a voluntary mechanism of re-appropriating the commercial
benefits of the sale of an anti-fatigue drugs called "Jeevani" to the local
Kani Tribes, whose traditional knowledge has led to the development
of that drug. Another example is the US University of California
who offers scholarships for people from developing countries. The scholarship
is funded from the royalties of the use of Xa 1 gene from rice.
These experiences provide valuable lessons for developing transparent and
implementable procedures for ensuring equity and ethics in the use of traditional
knowledge and genetic resources. Such voluntary example may prove to be
more useful as compared to national legislation such as the Philippine
Executive Order No. 247 relating to access to genetic resources which
almost stopped any form of collaboration with the Philippines.
The CBD marks a transition from an exploitative and inequitable relationship
between the source of biodiversity and the "outsiders" seeking to use such
biodiversity. One of the first steps to ensure equity in the TRIPS principles
in relation to genetic resources will be the disclosure of country of origin
of the germplasm and an agreement to provide compensation for input of
traditional knowledge, product development and use of resources. The initiative
by the CGIAR to use Material Transfer Agreements (MTA) is a good
step in this direction. In addition, there is also a need to develop an
Information Transfer Agreement (ITA) and a Knowledge Transfer
Agreement (KTA).
P. Balakrishna
M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Third Cross Street, Taramani Institutional Area, Chennai 600113, India. Phone (+91) 44 235 1698; Fax (+91) 44 235 1319; E-mail MDSAAA51@giasmd01.vsnl.net.in; URL www.mssrf.org
|
![]() |
| back to top |
|
|
|
|